- truth_hurtsAdmin
- Posts : 26
Join date : 2019-12-15
Location : Australia
Basic info of the error of GR
Sun Dec 15, 2019 8:23 pm
GR is based on a major error of rational thought.
That is the creation of something REAL and Physical, having physical properties, from the combination of exactly NOTHING, (Space) and a CONCEPT, (being the concept of Time)
"Spacetime" is a moronic reification of abstract ideas, therefore there is no such thing possible for consideration in the study of Physics. You cant have a "Geometry" of CONCEPTS.
How many CONCEPTS can fit into my box? Whats the tensile strength of my Concept? How far can my Concept of Spacetime be bent before it snaps?
If you REIFY concepts and call it Physics, you will always end up with NONSENSE.
That is the creation of something REAL and Physical, having physical properties, from the combination of exactly NOTHING, (Space) and a CONCEPT, (being the concept of Time)
"Spacetime" is a moronic reification of abstract ideas, therefore there is no such thing possible for consideration in the study of Physics. You cant have a "Geometry" of CONCEPTS.
How many CONCEPTS can fit into my box? Whats the tensile strength of my Concept? How far can my Concept of Spacetime be bent before it snaps?
If you REIFY concepts and call it Physics, you will always end up with NONSENSE.
- truth_hurtsAdmin
- Posts : 26
Join date : 2019-12-15
Location : Australia
test of image insert
Thu Dec 19, 2019 7:29 am
This image is what current Cosmologists are claiming about the Universe.
But if they are correct, then ALL Astronomical observations are WRONG, because Astronomy relies on "line of sight" classical Physics principals of STRAIGHT Light paths, to calculate distances, motions, calculate velocities, masses, etc.
Seems you can make totally contradictory claims in Physics these days, YET still be "correct".
But if they are correct, then ALL Astronomical observations are WRONG, because Astronomy relies on "line of sight" classical Physics principals of STRAIGHT Light paths, to calculate distances, motions, calculate velocities, masses, etc.
Seems you can make totally contradictory claims in Physics these days, YET still be "correct".
- truth_hurtsAdmin
- Posts : 26
Join date : 2019-12-15
Location : Australia
mercury without Einstein
Sat Dec 21, 2019 11:52 pm
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum