Spin Quantum Number

One of the worst examples in science history is when the experiments (sodium emission lines and Stern-Gerlach experiment) proved their atomic model wrong, they made new stuff up as an excuse to save their model instead of changing it. And this new stuff is worse than their original nonsense model, the electron spin. But they also say that electrons don't have spatial dimensions so they don't actually spin, but they still act like they spin?
Does this even make sense? It looks like a child that is lying and defending his/her lies with bad excuses, the only difference is that, most likely, these people believe their own lies.
It looks like they think the "smart" people who came up with this can't be wrong, so they believe whatever they say.

~(electron spin is too complicated to be understood by simple minded people like you only we the genius physicists can understand it even though we really don't.)

HI Sibal,
well, there a number of physicists that don't accept the Standard Model of Particle Physics.
The observations from the screen in a Particle Accelerator are claimed to represent quarks, gluons ant the most insane of all is the Graviton.
Even those traces we see in a cloud chamber need not be caused by tiny particles.

the particle model has to be pushed and pulled around all the time to fit what we Think we are seeing. There is a nested structure of assumptions that the whole theory hangs on.

Whats an apple made of? tiny particles called atoms, whats an atom, tiny particles called electron etc. whats an electron ? tiny particles called quarks. soon the will add to thus line of reasoning, the claim that the quark is made up of tiny particles.

i dislocated my elbow yesterday, so only type one finger, so too tricky to do capitals...